Why? I asked that a lot when I was a child. And I remember my mother's
exasperated response: "Why? Why? Why? Do you ever say anything else?" Well, sure
I did. But back of everything was always this insatiable desire to know the
roots of just about everything. I still ask why a lot.
"You are the only person I know who would erect a billboard and then argue
with it about what it says." A close family friend said that to me when I was a
teen. You know, I confess there must be a germ of truth there. I spout off lots of opinions and ideas here on my blog. And not a one of them is beyond further
inquiry as to why I arrived at that thinking or debate about if it's really the
truth.
If you're tempted to think I'm unwavering in opinion just because I
sometimes press back hard when my ideas are challenged, you certainly are
misreading me. The thing is, again, I love to get at the roots of things. If you
disagree with me, fine. But when I press when challenged it is because I know no
other way to get to the bottom of things. You see, I doubt you just as I doubt
myself. That's true even if you are an "authority."
All of us have areas where we have allowed our emotions into our thought
process. Further, I believe that sometimes a lot of our ideas and opinions have
there roots in emotional rather than reason-based thinking. Then we just kid
ourselves with arguments that justify our biases and then call that logic.
A local political columnist I used to exchange e-mails with once asked me
if I didn't, deep down, wish everybody thought the way I did and didn't I think
the world would be a better place if they did. He seemed to make it clear to
me by the paragraph surrounding his question that he wished everyone did think
more or less as he did (he was very much a conservative, politically and
religiously, and was a strong believer in absolutes) and that the world would be
better for it if it did.
No, I told him. Because opinions are highly personal and emotional things.
We call that latter having strong convictions, but that is just another way of
saying we really are being highly emotional. A world full of people just like me
would intolerable. It would be Hell to me. I certainly don't think I or anyone
knows enough about everything to declare exactly how things should be. It's just
a preposterous thought.
I close with this. The father of the modern skeptical movement was probably
Martin Gardner, a man of vast knowledge and deep thought. And yet, skeptic
though he was, he curiously was also a believer in a personal God, complete with
belief in immortality. Shockingly, he held these beliefs for purely emotional
reasons. He was a self-proclaimed fideist and his faith, he said, brought him
emotional comfort.
At least Gardner admitted it. Some of us have trouble admitting that some
of our treasured opinions are emotionally based. I'm that's true with
authorities, too.

2 comments:
I don't treasure my opinions. I enjoy someone or something that challenges them. My opinion is that men who cheat on their wives are horrible humans. That is based on my father cheating on my mother and it IS emotionally based, HOWEVER, I can see other perspectives, I can hear the man's side of it--living with my mother may have been a loving hell for my father--only he knows why he cheated. (and maybe even he doesn't/didn't know) So, yes, there is most certainly and emotional aspect but it does not cement my opinion. I find people with cemented opinions to be boring, hard-hearted, and difficult to be around. I fight not to become cemented down with emotion.
@ Diane,
I'm working on being a little more longsuffering with opinions I disagree with. I'm like you in that I enjoy having my thoughts challenged.
Post a Comment