Can our finite minds every fully understand the amazing cosmos of which we
all are a part? Just the fact that we are thinking beings in a comprehensible
universe strikes me as an amazing thing. It seems that it did Einstein, too, for
he said that "the most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is
comprehensible." For all the knowledge we have gained over the centuries and the
vast number of things we know, we haven't got it all figured out yet, nor can we
say we are close to having it all figured out.
Some three decades ago I slowly began a journey away from what is typically
considered a supernatural understanding of the universe (strong theism) to a
more natural worldview, pantheistic or panpyschistic - for want of a better
label. I can't say I'm totally comfortable standing where I do today, and
certainly I am not closed-minded. One thing I have never been able to rid myself
of is this niggling feeling that there may be a deeper reality in all of this.
Of course, maybe not.
I can't recall exactly when I encountered Carl Jung along the way, but some
of his insights meshed with a lot of my niggling suspicions. The world of
Synchronicity and oddball coincidences always fascinated me. As a child in
school I eagerly waited for the next edition in the popular Ripley's Believe
It Or Not paperback series, which only fueled my ideas about possible
deeper implications for reality. Jung at some point in his life entered into
a collaboration with renowned physicist Wolfgang Pauli in order to flesh out a
synchronistic view of reality. The result was interesting to me, but I admit not
conclusive. (And I still enjoy Ripley's Believe It Or Not.)
The greatest coincidence of all, it seems to me, is that we live in a
universe that has been described as fine-tuned or apparently fine-tuned. Some
fight that concept tooth-and-nail. If you are really into speculation, the
multiverse concept has been employed in order to give an explanation of why with
countless other universes having popped into existence along the way maybe it
isn't so strange that our unique universe popped into existence. According to
that line of thought it was almost inevitable.
I don't pretend to have the brain power necessary to assess all the
arguments pro and con and then come up with a considered opinion. It's enough
for me to keep an open mind and try to keep my intuitions and gut-feelings
somewhat in check. In the meantime I will continue to read and try to learn, but
most importantly, try to keep myself from falling back into some form of
fundamentalism, of reaching a conclusion that is THE
conclusion and which must be defended and protected at all cost.
It doesn't hurt me to say "I don't know." And allowing myself the freedom
to entertain alternative ways of looking at things is fun and liberating as
well.
And speaking of coincidence - real or imagined - I want to tack on below an
introduction from on article on the subject that was printed long ago in Harper's New Monthly Magazine Volume X, December
1854, to May 1855:
There are a thousand mysterious
circumstances occurring every day of our lives, the solution of which philosophy
fails to reach. And because this is the case, the wise heads dispose of them in
a very summary way, by denying the facts.
There are a thousand strange and mysterious
sympathies linking us with each other and drawing our hearts together, so that,
even when separated far away, we often have the same thoughts and feelings at
the same precise moment of time. The same sigh heaves breasts ocean-wide apart,
when the same longing desire springs up for communion face to face. And these,
these same philosophers dispose of quite as summarily, by calling them "striking
coincidences"—as if this were any explanation of
the phenomena.
The wildest dreams of the night are not more
wild and strange than those traits of the human mind in our waking hours, and
which, unaccounted for as they may be, still demonstrate to us a hidden chain of
sympathies running down the whole course of life, and binding our hearts
together. Call them by what name we will—they are still there, and still the
same. We can not get rid of them by denying their existence—and it does not
explain them to call them "coincidences."
2 comments:
Strange you would hold forth on this topic without mentioning Charles Fort.
I think you can hardly be unaware of him, or the Fortean Times, but if in fact you are unaware, great fascination awaits a perusal thereof.
@ Exrelayman,
I am aware of Fort, but never got farther than the opening pages of his Book of the Damned. Guess I'll try again sometime.
Post a Comment